Scribblings About Things
Nikon Z5II Viewfinder AF Point Bug
I had purchased Z5II recently to replace my aging Z6II, and after setting it up and familiarizing with it, I started using it as my main camera for assignments since a couple of weeks back.
Prior to my first assignment with the Z5II, as part of the familiarization phase I was shooting around with it in Auto-area subject detection mode most of the time on my usual suspects (e.g. my cat and kids).
However on my first assignment with it, I had to use Single Point AF for certain shots, and that is when I realized something - viewing through the viewfinder the AF point in Single Point AF mode feels different; it seems larger than what I am used to in the Z6II or the Zf, both of which utilizing the same 24MP-class sensor.
I brushed the issue aside initially as it might be due to me not being accustomed to the new camera yet, but after repeated assignments with it I was definitely quite certain the AF point is in fact larger than what I am used to.
So I ran a quick not-very-scientific test in a camera shop yesterday with all the 24MP class cameras they had - the Z5II, Z6II, Z6III, and Zf.
They were all set-up to AF-S and Single Point AF, and Focus point border width was set to “1” for cameras that had the option.
On the LCD display, all the cameras showed similar AF point sizes, including the Z5II, so nothing out of the ordinary here.
However when peered through the viewfinder, especially with grid lines activated, it became quite obvious that Z5II’s AF point indicator was larger than the rest:
When moving the AF point from one position to an adjacent position, the Z6II’s, Z6III’s and Zf ‘s AF point would share one border with the previously selected AF point, whereas the Z5II’s new AF point would slightly overlap the previously selected AF point.
With grid lines activated, when an AF point indicator was supposedly flushed with the grid lines on the back monitor, when viewed through the viewfinder of the Z5II, the AF point indicator “expands” and overflows the grid lines that were flushed on the back display.
This is not a major bug so to speak, but being so used to the AF point size (in Single point AF mode) of the 24MP-class Z bodies for so many years now, the slightly larger size irks me a quite a bit, and not to mention that it is quite confusing too when switching between the back LCD and the viewfinder mode.
tl;dr: In the Z5II, when using Single Point AF mode, the AF point indicator in the back LCD and the viewfinder are of slightly different sizes - with the indicator in the viewfinder being slightly larger. Operation wise there are no perceptible differences or problems (as per my experience).
I have contacted Nikon’s support regarding this issue and will post any updates I get from them.
Nikon Z6III Firmware 2.00 Released
Last week a major firmware update 2.00 has been released for the Z6III.
It can be downloaded on their official page here.
As with most major firmware updates, the list of changes is pretty substantial, so I recommend downloading and going through the supplementary manual which can be downloaded here.
(They do update the supplementary manual links sometimes so instead of linking directly to the supplementary manual’s PDF I have linked to the manual overview page instead)
This firmware adds many features recently included in the EXPEED7 bodies, such as Bird subject detection, Cycle AF-area mode, half-press to cancel MF zoom, focus point border width etc. to name a few.
It also adds certain features that were previously unique to the Z8/Z9, such as:
Auto capture feature
Pixel shift shooting with focus shift
Focus limiter
Recall shooting functions.
This is indeed a welcome move, as it helps show what the partially stacked sensor of the Z6III is capable of, and securing its position as a higher tier model than the Z5II.
Also to note, the top LCD illumination button is now customizable, which gives users more flexibility to use the button for other often used functions, especially in playback mode.
Now, one of the biggest additions of this firmware update is the addition of the C2PA Content Credentials Authentication feature. Granted it is not a feature that many would use, given the fact that activating this feature does slow down the camera (i.e. the buffer takes a hit) quite a bit, but I can see the use case of this for journalists who require proof of authenticity for their work. This is the first Nikon camera to implement this, and I can see it trickling upwards (oxymoronic I know) to the other pro bodies as a standard feature set too. Well, at least until Z8 and Z9 get their Nikon Imaging Cloud support.
Do definitely go through the manual or list if you are upgrading to learn more about the changes in depth!
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Announced
Last week the Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.2 S was announced.
The dedicated special contents page and technical specifications of the lens can be viewed here:
About a week right before the official announcement, Nikon Rumors reported that the lens was coming soon, and most users (including me) were wondering what would warrant an upgrade to the already solid Z 24-70/2.8S lens.
As discussions went on in the rumor thread, it seemed like most users would consider upgrading for the following advantages:
Weight reduction
Internal zoom mechanism
Increased zoom range
Larger aperture
As we knew that it was a Mark II, an increased zoom range and a larger aperture were definitely off the tables (they would definitely have marketed it as a new separate lens in this case), which brings the discussion down to pretty much:
“How much a weight reduction would warrant you to upgrade?”
“Is internal zoom even possible for this focal range without making it humongous?”
“Is this lens more for users who are buying a standard 2.8 zoom for the first time rather for current 24-70/2.8S users who want to upgrade?”
Truth be told, at that point of time I was equally confused (and intrigued as well) as to what the reason would be for them to release a refresh of the 24-70/2.8S.
On the official announcement day, it seems like they actually managed to do what most users want for a high end 24-70/2.8S, and then include some extra new icing as well.
To summarize the list of changes and new features of the 24-70/2.8S II,
130g (16%) lighter than the 24-70/2.8S, reduced filter size to 77mm
Internal zoom mechanism which maintains a compact 142mm length throughout the zoom range
Incorporation of their SSVCM into a zoom lens for the first time, resulting in 5x faster autofocus performance
Upgraded lens coatings to use the high end Meso Amorphous Coat to improve image clarity even in backlit situations
Variable minimum focus distance so that the lens can focus closer at shorter focal lengths (with maximum reproduction ratio at longest focal length)
New diaphragm design for more rounded bokeh
New click-declick switch for the clicking mechanism of the control ring
New filter adjustment window in lens hood for adjusting ND or CPL filters
It is a pretty impressive list of improvements across the board - individually they may seem like small improvements, but putting them all together does make it a very appealing lens for both new and current users, and I can imagine many current users of the 24-70/2.8S suddenly getting interested in upgrading for the improvements.
Personally while I am not in the market for a 24-70/2.8 lens, I am glad to see how they managed to refresh a solid lens with improvements in both handling and image quality.
Based on this release, I think I expect the following to happen:
Refresh of 70-200/2.8S with weight reduction and incorporation of SSVCM while maintaining internal zoom
An EXPEED 8 powered camera (Z9II?) that could make full use of the higher scan rate and AF acquisition speeds of the new lens
Future S-line lenses would have the control ring click switch as the norm
Lens hoods with filter adjustment windows would come to more lenses, notably lenses that are often used with video or landscapes
Now, if only they could make an internal zoom 35-150/2.8…
Nikon Minor Firmware and Software Updates
Nikon has released minor firmware updates for the D780, D6, as well as a minor revision of NX Studio, which fixes certain bugs.
D780 FW 1.20 (Download here at official page)
Fixes a bug with black band shaped fog appearing in live view photos under certain conditions.D6 FW 1.70 (Download here at official page)
Fixes a bug with overexposure when [Recall shooting functions (hold)] is assigned and used.NX Studio 1.9.1 (Download here at official page)
Fixes bugs with printing, login dialog, and pixel shift merging.
As mentioned previously, from NX Studio 1.9.0 onwards, there is a need to login to your Nikon account in order to use the software, so if you are in an air-gapped situation it might be wise to keep a copy of the 1.8.0 installer (which is still available at the link pasted above as of writing).
Unless you are using models from Z5II and later - in that case only 1.9.0 and later would support the newer camera models.
Nikon Z8 Firmware 3.01 Released
Earlier today a minor firmware update for the Z8, firmware version 3.01, was released by Nikon.
It can be downloaded on their official page here.
This firmware update addressed the issue with certain 3rd party lenses (most notably Tamron lenses) not functioning properly after applying FW 3.00 that was released a couple of weeks back.
I covered in a previous post regarding the issue, and also did a small write-up about how I found the situation to be blown a bit out of proportions by online chatter.
To be honest I actually expected Tamron to be rolling out the firmware updates for the lenses, since they did officially mention that they were investigating the issue. But I guess there are deeper exchanges behind closed doors behind the two manufacturers and whatever fixes that were required have now been implemented by Nikon in FW 3.01 instead.
And to be honest, I am glad that the issue is resolved by Nikon’s firmware since you just have to update the body for full compatibility, rather than having to update the individual lenses.
It might have been an unfortunate oversight by Nikon in FW 3.00 that caused the issues with Tamron lenses, but I still stand by my point that if you are using 3rd party lenses, even officially licensed ones, you definitely need to be wary about updating cameras, especially so if you are using the bodies for critical work.
Anyway from preliminary reports online, as expected it seems like the affected Tamron lenses now work properly on the Z8. There were also reports of certain other reverse-engineered 3rd party lenses also seem to work again on the Z8, though there are conflicting results based on which manufacturer or which lens is in question.
This issue seems to be resolved for now, so let’s just stop the finger pointing and enjoy the camera more.
Overblown Arguments Over Third Party Support of Nikon Z8 Firmware 3.00
As I had mentioned in my post a couple of days back, there have been reports of Tamron lenses not working, either partially or completely disabled, with Nikon Z8’s latest firmware 3.00. Tamron themselves have also posted a service advisory regarding this issue on their official site.
I do get that some users are frustrated over the fact that the native Z-mount Tamron lenses that they own are not fully compatible with the latest Z8 firmware, even though Z-mount Tamron lenses are supposed to be developed under license from Nikon.
In addition to that, several new reports of third party mount adapters from Megadap or Techart are not working as well after the update have also surfaced in the past couple of days.
And this has let to quite a bit of overblown arguments online with regards to who is to blame for this and in more extreme cases, how this firmware update is entirely not up to par, leading to some users calling it a fiasco of an update.
To be honest I do think this is quite a disappointing reaction to see from the users, especially considering the fact that many new features have been implemented in this new firmware update, so calling this firmware update a failure just because third party support is not perfect somehow sounds to me like an entitled user whining.
Before I continue, I think Tamron needs to be given a huge round of applause for acknowledging the issue early (literally the same day the firmware update was released) and letting users know that they are looking into the situation. It is indeed a good move from them to instill confidence in their customers.
So now, we all know that firmware updates (no matter major or minor) have shown time and time again that third party electronic peripherals, be it lenses or batteries, may no longer work as intended due to protocol changes or code changes. This has always been the case, so usage of third party accessories will always bring this risk as manufacturers might update certain safety or security protocols and do not guarantee full compatibility with using said third party accessories; even more so for accessories developed through reverse engineering of the electronic protocols.
I know this first hand - I sent in my D800 for routine maintenance in the past and the service center updated my camera to the latest firmware, which led to my Sigma 35/1.4DG HSM being unable to autofocus at all. It was fixed by updating the Sigma lens via the USB Dock.
The main argument for this current problem right now is that Tamron officially developed the said native Z-mount lenses under a license from Nikon, and because of this the lenses should work as intended with the latest camera body firmware update as it is released.
Unfortunately I think that this argument is not sound at all, since it would mean that Nikon would have to develop its firmware around how Tamron writes their lenses’ firmware, either that or Nikon would have to wait for Tamron to finish up updating their lenses’ firmware before releasing the Z8 FW3.00 penalizing users who are using native Nikon lenses.
Either of these scenarios just sounds improbable from Nikon’s point of view don’t you think?
On top of that, the actual licensing of the lens mount protocol from Nikon to develop the lenses is not a transparent transaction - apart from the manufacturers themselves (and I would argue even so only a handful within the organizations), no one else outside that circle knows what exactly is being licensed and what kind of royalties are in play over here.
If you look over the fence at the E-mount system, Tamron, and even Sigma, release firmware updates for their lenses every now and then when a new body is released or a firmware update for a current body might have changed something. So this is not exactly something new even when things are being developed in partnership or under a license.
Some argued that Nikon should have sent Tamron a beta copy or SDK of the FW3.00 so that they could prepare firmware updates for their lenses when FW3.00 landed. I do agree with this argument, since as partners this should be the case to maintain the relationship down the road, and if Nikon did not send them any prior information or SDK for Tamron to update their firmware, then I do agree that it is a huge oversight on Nikon’s end, especially considering that Tamron does have quite a fair bit of lenses for the Z-mount.
But objectively speaking, no one knows whether Nikon did or did not send them a SDK, and no one knows if Tamron has perhaps already been working on updates for their lenses prior to the release but just unfortunately could not make it in time for the actual release of FW3.00.
The 2-week gap between the announcement of Z8’s FW3.00 and the actual release date might actually be a little hint that there was more going behind closed doors than we are allowed to know.
Also as of now, it is not as if the lenses are bricked totally (since many users do comment that the lenses have no issues working on their other Z bodies), and the main culprit seems to be the newly added Focus Limiter function. Furthermore, Nikon is one of the few camera manufacturers I know of (or in fact, the only camera manufacturer) that allows you to rollback your firmware to an older version if required.
So right now, if you are using Tamron lenses as a main lens on your Z8, you have these 3 options:
If none of the FW3.00 new features are immediately crucial or required, just rollback to FW2.10 (or not update your Z8 if you have not done so) and you will get the full intended compatibility of the lens and body as it always has been.
If you need Focus Limiter, run Z8 on FW2.10 and use Tamron Lens Utility software to customize the custom function and button to map Tamron’s version of Focus Limiter to the lens.
If you need FW3.00 features other than Focus Limiter, update your Tamron lenses, disable all custom functions on the Tamron lenses (especially Tamron’s version of Focus Limiter via the Tamron Lens Utility software), and the lenses should work as intended on Z8 FW3.00. Do note that this might still cause some unintended hiccups here and there since Tamron has not officially come out to mention what other compatibility issues are there.
However if you are in the group which requires both FW3.00 features immediately and the Focus Limiter ability, your only choice is to just sit down and wait for Tamron’s firmware update. And also perhaps ponder over the above 3 suggestions I gave regarding to workarounds right now. (Update on 16/07/2025: Firmware 3.01 is now out by Nikon which addresses this issue, so you do not have to update each individual lens but just update the camera instead.)
Lastly, regarding other reverse-engineered lenses and mount adapters, the final verdict on their compatibility is still hazy at best, but to play safe it is best to just stick with FW2.10 for now while keeping a lookout on the respective manufacturers’ websites for firmware updates in the coming days.
To summarize everything up, yes the firmware 3.00 for the Nikon Z8 did cause some compatibility issues with 3rd party lenses, even for those developed under license from Nikon. But to be fair we do not know what the license covers, and we also do not know whether Nikon themselves actually did provide SDKs to Tamron prior to the firmware’s release as part of their partnership. It always has been up to the third party manufacturers themselves to ensure compatibility, and if you need your gear working right now you could just rollback the firmware to the older FW2.10 and have everything working as it was.
A little patience goes a long way, so be glad that there are options to make the gear work just as it was. Go out and enjoy shooting!
Nikon Z8 Firmware 3.00 and Image Rotation Settings
A new option called [Auto-rotate during playback] has been added to the playback menu category form firmware 3.00 of the Z8.
If you are like me and got confused with what it actually does since there is already a [Auto-rotate pictures] option in the playback menu, and with both the manual and supplementary manual not giving clear enough explanations, fret not as I have managed to decipher what actually is going on!
So just a little history lesson first. With firmware 2.00 Nikon introduced the [Auto image rotation] option to the playback menu, which sat above the [Auto-rotate pictures] option and was as confusing as it could get in terms of naming. (I had written an article here when FW2.00 was announced)
With firmware 2.10 they thankfully relabeled [Auto image rotation] to [Record camera orientation], which makes it clearer what the option actually does.
However one thing I need to mention here is that the reference guide (both the PDF and the online version) is kind of misleading as to what [Record camera orientation] does, since as a setting by itself it does not automatically rotate images when viewed in camera. The supplementary manual for firmware 2.00 actually had a better explanation in the footnote, which I will paste here for reference (edited for the new label):
If [OFF] is selected for [Auto-rotate pictures], images displayed on the camera during playback are always in landscape (wide) orientation, regardless of whether [ON] or [OFF] is selected for [Auto image rotation] [Record camera orientation].
If [OFF] is selected for [Auto image rotation] [Record camera orientation], images displayed during playback are always in landscape (wide) orientation, even if [ON] is selected for [Auto-rotate pictures].
Ok so with this, I will begin explaining how these 3 settings, [Record camera orientation], [Auto-rotate pictures], and [Auto-rotate during playback] work in tandem with each other.
The very first option, [Record camera orientation], writes into the image file the orientation of the camera when the image is captured (for simplicity let’s just use “portrait” or “landscape” orientation).
If this setting is turned off, regardless of what the settings for [Auto-rotate pictures] and [Auto-rotate during playback] are, images will always be viewed as a landscape image on both the camera monitor and on PC.
This setting needs to be turned on for the other 2 settings to have any effect.
So assuming that [Record camera orientation] is turned on, what [Auto-rotate pictures] then does is that when the playback button is being pressed, depending on the camera orientation at the time when playback is initialized, portrait orientation images would be rotated to fit the screen, i.e. when [Auto-rotate pictures] is on,
When holding the camera in a portrait orientation (vertically), and pressing the playback button, portrait orientation images will fill the screen.
When holding the camera in a landscape orientation (horizontally), and pressing the playback button, portrait orientation images will be shown as vertical images on the horizontal screen (black spaces to the left and right).
However if [Auto-rotate pictures] is turned off, even if [Record camera orientation] is turned on images are always shown horizontally filling the entire screen regardless of what orientation the image was when shot and what orientation the camera was in when playback is pressed.
(This is the exact reason why I mentioned that the reference guide’s explanation is misleading)
So with that, now what does the new [Auto-rotate during playback] do?
Its requirements are that [Record camera orientation] and [Auto-rotate pictures] have to be turned on, and from there, if [Auto-rotate during playback] is turned on, during the playback process, portrait orientation images will be rotated in real-time depending on the camera’s current orientation, and not the orientation at the point whereby the playback button is pressed.
To summarize:
[Record camera orientation] writes orientation data to the image file; needs to be turned on for the other 2 settings to work.
[Auto-rotate pictures] will rotate portrait orientation images depending on what the camera’s orientation is at when the playback button is pressed; needs to be turned on for [Auto-rotate during playback] to work.
[Auto-rotate during playback] will rotate portrait orientation images to match the current camera’s orientation regardless of what the camera’s orientation was at when the playback button was pressed.
Hope this information helps!
Nikon Z8 Firmware 3.00 Issue With Tamron Lenses
Just like to inform Z8 users out there who are using native Z-mount Tamron lenses that there is an issue with the newly released Z8 FW3.00 with said Tamron lenses.
With the new firmware installed, there have been numerous complaints and feedback regarding Tamron lenses not being recognized by the camera body at all.
Tamron has issued a notification regarding this issue at their official support site here.
Some users have found that by turning off the newly added “Focus Limiter” function, it solved the issue and the Tamron lenses would work as normal, but if you are worried about other functions breaking with the Tamron lenses (like custom Tamron button functions and such), I think it might be safer to just stick with FW 2.10 first until Tamron release firmware updates for their lenses.
I will update this page again when more information becomes available either from Tamron or Nikon.
** Update 3/7/2025
It seems that for the Tamron 35-150/2-2.8, as long as you’re running on firmware 2 on the lens, the lens works without issues on FW3.00 Z8 as long as custom functions are not mapped to the lens via Tamron Lens Utility and the Z8’s new focus limiter is turned off.
I suppose this should be the case for the other Z-mount Tamron lenses too, but I do not own them to test out.
** Update 16/7/2025
FW 3.01 is now officially out and can be downloaded here from Nikon’s site. It resolves the issue with Tamron lenses. My write-up of the patch can be read here.
Nikon Z8 Firmware 3.00 Released
The previously announced Z8 firmware 3.00 is now officially released.
It can be downloaded on their official page here.
Since it is a major firmware update, the list of changes is pretty substantial, and along with it comes a supplementary manual which can be downloaded here.
(They do update the supplementary manual links sometimes so instead of linking directly to the supplementary manual’s PDF I have linked to the manual overview page instead)
I covered in my previous post regarding some of the changes that were announced, so do refer to it if you would like a summary of the changes in the new firmware.
I will update my camera some time later this week after my assignments are over and write a more detailed article on my opinions on the changes after I have tested them out.
Nikon Z50II, Z5II, Z6III and Zf Firmware Updates Released
Nikon has released minor firmware updates for the Z50II, Z5II, Z6III and Zf.
The new firmware can be downloaded directly from their official pages listed below:
This is a minor firmware update which brings about some text changes for Nikon Imaging Cloud connection procedures.
The Z5II’s update also includes some minor changes to SnapBridge and the d13 custom menu item.
Is a New Nikon Lens Announcement Imminent?
Over the past few weeks Nikon has released firmware updates for all of its mirrorless bodies, regardless whether they are running on EXPEED6 or EXPEED7.
With the exception of the Z8 FW3.00 announcement (and the actual firmware download is still unavailable as of writing), most of these firmware updates address operational bug fixes.
However, I cannot help but wonder, with the timing of everything being so coincidental and sequential, perhaps a lens announcement would happen soon?
We all know that in Nikon’s case, when new lenses are released which requires specific instructions for the camera bodies (like forced distortion control etc.), a firmware update is required before said lens can be used.
Fingers crossed here, but I wonder if something would drop together with the official release of Z8 FW 3.00 download link!
Nikon Z8 Firmware 3.00 Announced
Last week, Nikon announced firmware 3.00, a major firmware update, for the Nikon Z8.
Details of the firmware changes can be viewed at the special contents page on their official website (in English here).
For Japanese readers, unfortunately there is no special content page yet, so the information is on the Z8’s product page here, and the press release here.
Interestingly, it is not a development announcement, yet the actual firmware is unavailable for download (both at time of announcement and at the time of this post), which I suspect might be due to last minute ironing out of bugs or wanting to coincide with the Photonext 2025 convention last week.
Being a major firmware update, there are some new features being implemented in this firmware, and some of the more prominent ones are:
Pixel shift combined with focus shift or AE bracketing. This is definitely a big plus for macro shooters or still-life studio shooters since you can eliminate moire and also get high resolution images.
In-camera focus distance limiter. I can see how it would be useful for a wide range of photographers to prevent unnecessary hunting and improve response speeds. It feels like an evolution of the auto-capture feature implemented for the Z9 (and later the Z8), which brings me to wonder if the directional movement detection of the auto-capture feature could be implemented in normal shooting modes too.
Support for flexible color picture controls. This would bring the Z8’s picture control support more in-line with the newer EXPEED7 bodies, though as of writing the announcement did not mention any support for Nikon Imaging Cloud, so I suppose Imaging Recipes are still not supported with FW3.00. With flexible color picture control support, one workaround for this is to use a Imaging Cloud-enabled body (as of writing, Z50II, Z5II, Z6III, Zf), load one of the Imaging Cloud Recipes you like and take a shot, extract the picture control profile using NX Studio, and load it into the FW3.00 Z8.
Custom wide-area AF (C1/C2) have been updated to support up to 135 different patterns (from the initial 20 patterns in previous firmware versions), and also the customizations are enabled to the edges of the sensor (29 x 17) as well, as compared to the previous 21 x 13 maximum area. This is significant as it brings a lot more options for the custom wide-area AF (and more in line with the newer EXPEED7 bodies), and this is the first Nikon body with the 45.7MP sensor with full customization for this, and we can be quite sure that something similar will be available for the Z9 soon enough.
Subject detection is now available in manual focus modes, similar to that of the Zf and Z6III.
There are also other quality of life and workflow improvements, such as higher zoom magnification or voice memo implementations, as well as some video-related upgrades, all of which are detailed in the links provided at the top of this post.
One particular feature that sounds a bit confusing right now is the new a14 option “Maximum Aperture Live View”. In the special contents page it sounds like it would work for autofocus as well by focusing at maximum aperture and stopping down just right before shooting (like how the DSLRs worked) for better accuracy and light gathering during focusing. However, a similar implementation for the Z9 seems to work only for manual focus, so either this feature has been refined for the Z8 (and updated for the Z9 accordingly), or there is some misunderstanding on how the feature would work.
Nevertheless I’m definitely glad that new features are coming!
Nikon Z6II and Z7II Firmware Update 1.70 Released
Nikon has released firmware 1.70 for both the Nikon Z6II and Z7II.
The new firmware can be downloaded directly from their official page here (for Z6II) and here (for Z7II).
Unfortunately no, this is not the unicorn FW2.00 that would miraculously bring the power of the dual EXPEED6 to EXPEED7 levels (running joke in the community just in case anyone gets offended).
It adds Russian language for units sold in the region, and also fixes some operational bugs with regards to touch AF and viewfinder settings.
Nikon Zf Minor Firmware Update 2.01 Released
Nikon released firmware 2.01, a minor firmware update, for the Nikon Zf.
The new firmware can be downloaded directly from their official page here.
It addresses a bug which caused an error in the camera under certain conditions when using Multiple Exposure, so definitely update it if this is a feature you use often.
Nikon Z6 and Z7 Firmware Update 3.80 Released
Nikon released firmware 3.80 for both the Nikon Z6 and Z7.
The new firmware can be downloaded directly from their official page here (for Z6) and here (for Z7).
It addresses a bug which caused the camera to record shutter speeds incorrectly in the Exif when using bulb or time mode for long exposures.
Nikon Z50 and Zfc Minor Firmware Updates and Nikon Software Updates
Over the past couple of days Nikon released some minor firmware updates for the Z50 and the Zfc, together with minor software updates to NX Studio and Wireless Transmitter Utility (WTU).
The firmware can be downloaded from their respective official links here:
Z50 download page
Zfc download page
Similarly, the software updates can be downloaded here:
NX Studio
Wireless Transmitter Utility
The minor updates for the cameras and software are small bug fixes as well as adding support to the Z5II.
However, one particular thing to take note about the new NX Studio is that it now requires logging into a Nikon account in order to use it. I am not sure how the repercussions would be with air-gapped PCs, so it might be a good time to make sure that you keep a copy of NX Studio 1.8.0 (the previous version) which does not require signing in. The official direct download page is here - this link will be archived once the next version comes out so do act fast if you need it.
As for the WTU, even with this update I still cannot get it to work properly (will write a separate post on this), so unless they do a major overhaul on the underlying code and protocols, I cannot recommend it as a reliable way to beam photos to your PC.
Nikon Z50II and Z9 Minor Firmware Updates Released
Earlier this week Nikon has released minor firmware updates for both the Z50II and the Z9.
The new firmware for the Z50II (Version 1.01) can be downloaded here from their official site.
Similarly, the new firmware for the Z9 (Version 5.20) can be downloaded here from their official site.
As mentioned these are minor updates, so I decided to just write about both in one article.
Firstly for the Z50II, FW 1.01 fixes some bugs with remote shooting and Snapbridge, renamed an item in Custom Settings, and added support for pre-release capture with Smallrig’s remote as well as a new language.
As for the Z9, FW 5.20 also tackled with bugs affecting remote shooting and burst shooting operations, as well as renaming the same item in Custom Settings menu.
An interesting note for FW 5.20 is that NX Field, which used to be a paid upgrade, is now available to the Z9 with this firmware upgrade. While I am not the targeted audience for NX Field, this is definitely a generous move for those who use Z9’s in such situations.
On a more interesting note, the particular bug fix regarding pressing playback after shooting multiple bursts could in some instances corrupt images, I actually fell victim to this bug once on the Z7. While I had no issues recovering the files using a file recovery software, I was unable to replicate that error and just ignored it as a one-off event and just attributed it to user error. Quite interesting to see now that a fix is out for it for the Z9, so perhaps the other models might be affected as well?
Just wondering what the exact conditions are to trigger that bug..hmm..
Nikon Long Lens Options for Hobbyists
Recently I have been talking to a few of my friends who have just recently picked up photography as a hobby, and they are dabbling with the thoughts of getting some longer lenses to capture their kids’ events like sports day or drama performances.
As we brain-stormed through the various options available to the Z mount currently, it dawned upon me that the telephoto realm is really a dangerous spot for GAS, as for every option available, there is another option that would compensate the former’s weaknesses or compromises.
I thought that maybe it would be a good idea to do a very brief summary of long lens options that would not require incur the wrath of bankruptcy. So long-term GAS affected patients, please do not start bombarding me about the missing Z 400/2.8 TC or the Z 600/4 TC lenses in my list below.
Since technology would evolve over time, if any one happens to find this post in the future, please do take note of when this article was posted before you start to flame me with an option that was not available at time of writing.
Let’s start with bodies first. (Yeah I know the title said lens but, there are DX lenses too.)
With the introduction of the two EXPEED7 siblings, the Z50II and the Z5II, I think pretty much anyone looking at getting a new camera for kids’ sports should definitely consider either body. They share the same autofocus system, which itself is inherited from the bigger EXPEED7 siblings, so in terms of subject detection, autofocus tracking and focus accuracy they are just limited by their own sensor readout speeds.
Tight budget: Z50II. It is the most affordable EXPEED7 camera body now. And also being an APS-C camera, it would give extra reach with attached lenses, which is useful for our said scenario. Pairing it with the DX 50-250/4.5-6.3 VR could make a really compact telephoto set.
Some wiggle room for budget: Z5II. While it sits at the bottom of the full-frame camera line, it sports a very capable 24.5MP BSI sensor, which when coupled with the EXPEED7, delivers beautiful files and great autofocus performance.
Even more room for budget: Z8. It comes with a fully stacked 45.7MP sensor, which is a speed demon itself. The camera delivers blackout free shooting, which is very helpful for framing fast action shots. The 45.7MP also gives a lot of room to crop, which is beneficial if getting extra long telephotos is not feasible.
(I know the Z6III is omitted here. As of writing, I just cannot recommend the Z6III for such use case now due to its lack of customizations (due to be fixed in a firmware update), and the Z5II just provides a way better cost performance when compared to the Z6III)
Next let’s look at the lenses.
Tight budget: Nikon Z DX 50-250/4.5-6.3 VR. This lens when fully zoomed in would result in an equivalent 375mm lens, and when paired with the fast Z50II it should be able to tackle most outdoor sports events with no issues. However this option should only be considered if the Z50II is used.
Tight budget (FX version): Tamron 70-300/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD. It is the most affordable native Z-mount telephoto lens right now, although it only ends at 300mm. While might not be long enough for some outdoors sports events, its f/6.3 aperture will help tame the ISO a bit in indoor venues. It does not come with any optical stabilization system, so I highly suggest that you do not pair this lens with any of the current DX cameras.
Some wiggle room for budget: Tamron 150-500/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD, or Nikon AF-S 200-500/5.6 VR via FTZ. Both of these lenses go up to 500mm, with the Tamron being a native Z lens and slightly lighter at the expense of a slower aperture, and the Nikon requiring a FTZ adapter making the set front heavy. The Nikon should have no issues indoors as well with its faster aperture in the tele range.
More wiggle room for budget: Tamron 50-400/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD or Nikon Z 28-400/4-8 VR. While both of these are 400mm class lenses, their starting focal length and aperture ranges are very different. The Tamron has a slightly tamer maximum aperture range, and goes down to a normal 50mm view. The Nikon on the other hand goes all the way down to 28mm, but at the expense of a small aperture at telephoto ranges. The Nikon could be a one lens solution since it covers the wide angle range too, but its slow aperture means that it would struggle really hard in indoor situations.
Even more room for budget: Nikon 180-600/5.6-6.3 VR. I’d say just treat this as a constant f/6.3 lens. It’s an upgrade everywhere as compared to its predecessor, the AF-S 200-500/5.6 VR, and the only lens on this list that goes to 600mm, but ultimately as compared to all the other options here it is the heaviest and longest so that itself might be a concern too.
Image quality priority at non-bankruptcy budget: Nikon Z 100-400/4.5-5.6 VR S or Nikon Z 400/4.5 VR S. I think this should most probably be the reasonable budget limit for most users, and while they are both 400mm class lenses, their fast aperture (especially with the prime) would give the best image quality as compared to the other options here. It boils down to if you treasure flexibility (100-400/4.5-5.6) or pure speed and clarity (400/4.5).
One thing that was intriguing to me was how Tamron seems to be helping cover Nikon’s consumer telephoto range quite a bit, and I for one am glad that such options are available for the system, since most of Nikon’s own solutions cater to the slightly higher end of the spectrum.
I think that it would be nice to see more APS-C specific telephoto options, since now with the Z50II we now have a highly capable DX body. Perhaps it would launch with the unicorn Z80?