Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S
Purchased: Aug 2022
Status: In Active Use
Entry Date: 19/10/2022
Purchased this as a primary workhorse lens to replace the 24-70/4S in the standard range.
Although it officially went on sale in Feb 2022, I wanted to read more about it and try it out myself in shops before purchasing it - I ended up placing an order in May or so at my usual camera store but as it had a long waiting list I only managed to get my set in Aug.
Typical of S-line lenses it has great performance throughout its focal length range - sharpness, flare resistance, LoCA control are all great. That said, this lens does not correct geometric distortions optically - there is a pretty strong barrel distortion in the wide end, which changes to pincushion distortion at the tele end. These distortions are automatically corrected in-camera via distortion control (which will be turned on by default in the camera, and the option would be greyed out and cannot be turned off), some RAW editors would require specifically turning on the distortion control when post processing to mitigate the strong distortions.
An interesting find is how long it took for the lens to “boot-up” - most of my other lenses usually make a quick whirring sound when the camera is powered on as the focus is racked for calibration, together with a quick aperture blade opening sound, whereas this lens took slightly longer in this boot-up process and I could feel the focus motor racking the lens. Happens on both my Z6 and my Z6II, so definitely not camera-body dependent. I thought I might have a faulty AF motor initially, but looking at the demo sets in the shops, it seems that it is a characteristic of this lens since all of them pretty much boot up equally slow.
This was one of the lenses which uses a new plastic housing to keep weight down - this plastic has a more textured outlook that feels quite different in hand than the initial Z lenses (like the primes, 24-70/4S, 70-200/2.8S). It also does not get as cold (or hot) easily during temperature fluctuations, and I am indeed thankful for that. I think the previous lens that used a similar housing was the Z 105mm macro?
Focus speed is pretty snappy, though not instantaneous as some of the more premium lenses. Does not seem to hunt much and locks on confidently in good light, and AF-C seems to follow the subject properly. AF-S shows much better AF accuracy when in low-light situations. Guess the algorithm underlying might be slightly different?
Entry Date: 7/2/2024
After owning this lens for more than a year now, it still is my go-to workhorse standard lens. Having a 5x zoom is definitely a breeze to work with, and the ability to go close and shoot semi-macro shots (0.39x at MFD of 35cm) has been helpful in many situations like up-close ring shots.
I have gotten used to the slow-ish boot-up times now, though I definitely wish that it could be faster at times since I like to power off my camera when moving and not actively shooting/framing the shot.
I find that while it handles fine with the Z6/Z6II, adding the vertical grip Z-GR1 does improve balance and handling a lot more.
Since it does not come with VR it relies on IBIS for stabilization purposes, and while effective for most situations, using “focus and recomposing” methods do require the IBIS to stabilize a bit (say 0.5s or so) before pressing the shutter button. I have seen some of my shots that turned out just a bit fuzzy because I pressed the button too early before the IBIS stabilized.
I used the Marumi Super DHG lens protection filter initially, and swapped to an Arcrest protection filter last July. The Arcrest filter seems to produce lens veiling flare when shooting into backlit situations and seems easier to clean too. It still ghosts at times, especially with point light sources in or just at the edge of the frame, but not as much as the Marumi.
Previously I envied Sony users since they have access to the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8, and when the Z-mount was announced I did toy with the idea of replacing this lens with the Tamron as a workhorse lens (since it could also essentially cover my 70-200/2.8S range and let me use a prime instead). However after handling the lens in person at the store, I realized I preferred the handling of the 24-120/4S much more, and also the materials used in the Tamron just somehow does not quite instill confidence in me regarding its weather/dust resistance. I guess the fully exposed USB-C port is one of the reasons as well?
I am definitely sticking with this 24-120/4S now for the foreseable future, until Nikon releases its version of 35-150 (or some similar variant).